When Ida May Fuller received check number 00-000-001 from the Social Security Administration in 1940, for the modest sum of $22.54, she couldn’t have known she was making history.
The retired legal secretary from Vermont became the first American to receive a monthly retirement benefit payment under the newly implemented Social Security system.
By the time of her death in 1975 at the age of 100, Fuller had collected nearly $23,000 in benefits, despite having paid just $24.75 into the system—an early illustration of both the program’s promise and its long-term financial challenges.
From those humble beginnings, Social Security has evolved into the most far-reaching and consequential social program in American history, now delivering monthly payments to more than 70 million Americans.
The story of how these payments have changed over time—in amount, calculation method, and purchasing power—offers a fascinating window into America’s evolving social contract and economic priorities.
The Birth of Social Security: Depression-Era Origins
The Social Security Act of 1935 emerged from the depths of the Great Depression, when widespread poverty among the elderly had become a national crisis.
President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed the landmark legislation on August 14, 1935, establishing a system of old-age benefits financed through payroll taxes.
“We can never insure one hundred percent of the population against one hundred percent of the hazards and vicissitudes of life,” Roosevelt acknowledged when signing the bill, “but we have tried to frame a law which will give some measure of protection to the average citizen and to his family.”
Importantly, the original program was far more limited than today’s system.
Initial monthly benefit payments ranged from $10 to $85 ($194 to $1,649 in today’s dollars), calculated based on a worker’s average earnings.
The first regular monthly payments didn’t begin until January 1940, after sufficient reserves had been built up through payroll tax collections that began in 1937.
Dr. Edwin Witte, executive director of the Committee on Economic Security that drafted the original legislation, later reflected: “None of us anticipated that Social Security would grow to the proportions it has or provide the level of economic security for the aged and disabled that it now does. We were building on hope as much as certainty.”
The 1950s-1960s: Expansion and Growth
The post-World War II economic boom created conditions for significant expansions of Social Security, both in coverage and payment amounts.
The 1950 amendments marked a watershed moment, increasing benefits by an average of 77% and extending coverage to regularly employed farm and domestic workers—groups initially excluded from the system, with particularly severe impacts on African American workers.
“My grandmother had worked as a domestic for wealthy families in Charleston her entire life, but was initially left out of the system entirely,” recalled James Williams, a retired history professor I interviewed.
“The 1950 changes finally recognized her work as real work deserving of retirement protection. It transformed her later years.”
In 1956, the program expanded again to include disability benefits, acknowledging that income insecurity could stem from physical inability to work, not just old age.
The first disability checks, averaging about $80 monthly, were mailed in October 1957 to approximately 150,000 disabled workers.
Throughout this period, benefit increases came through ad hoc legislative actions rather than automatic adjustments, requiring Congress to periodically pass laws authorizing payment increases.
Between 1940 and 1972, Congress enacted benefit increases eleven times, with the amounts ranging from 7% to 20%.
A particularly significant increase came in 1972, when benefits rose by 20% across the board—the largest single increase in the program’s history until that point.
“Politicians discovered that raising Social Security benefits was extremely popular with voters,” noted Martha Derthick, a political scientist who extensively studied the program’s development.
“This created a situation where benefits increased significantly, often in election years, but without corresponding increases in revenue to sustain those higher payment levels.”
The Birth of COLAs: Automatic Adjustments Begin
The 1970s marked a turning point in how Social Security payments evolved over time.
High inflation during this period created pressure to protect beneficiaries from rapidly eroding purchasing power.
In 1972, Congress implemented automatic annual cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs) tied to the Consumer Price Index, ending the need for ad hoc benefit increases through legislation.
The first automatic COLA, a substantial 8%, took effect in June 1975, reflecting the high inflation rates of the period.
This shift to automatic adjustments represented a fundamental change in how the program operated, ensuring that benefits would, at least in theory, maintain their purchasing power during inflationary periods.
“The COLA mechanism was revolutionary,” explained Robert Ball, who served as Social Security Commissioner from 1962 to 1973.
“It meant that beneficiaries no longer had to organize and lobby Congress for increases. Their benefits would rise automatically with inflation—a protection most private pensions didn’t offer.”
The timing proved fortuitous, as double-digit inflation in the late 1970s would have devastated fixed benefit amounts.
In 1980, the COLA reached a historic high of 14.3%, the largest percentage increase in the program’s history—a record that still stands today.
The 1980s Crisis and Reform
By the early 1980s, Social Security faced its most serious financial crisis to date.
High unemployment, combined with demographic shifts and the generous benefit increases of the 1970s, threatened the system’s solvency.
In 1983, with the program months away from being unable to pay full benefits, President Ronald Reagan and House Speaker Tip O’Neill formed a bipartisan commission that developed compromise legislation to shore up the program’s finances.
The resulting amendments gradually increased the retirement age from 65 to 67 (phased in over several decades), taxed benefits for higher-income recipients for the first time, and accelerated previously scheduled payroll tax increases.
These changes fundamentally altered the trajectory of payment growth, effectively reducing long-term benefit levels compared to what they would have been without intervention.
“We faced hard choices,” recalled Alan Greenspan, who chaired the commission.
“Either benefits had to be reduced from scheduled levels, taxes had to increase beyond planned rates, or some combination of both. There simply wasn’t a pain-free solution.”
For beneficiaries, the immediate impact was relatively modest, as current retirees were largely protected.
However, future generations would receive somewhat lower replacement rates (the percentage of pre-retirement income replaced by Social Security) as a result of the gradual retirement age increase.
The 1990s: Moderate Growth in a Strong Economy
As inflation moderated in the 1990s, Social Security COLAs became more modest compared to the volatile 1970s and early 1980s.
Throughout the decade, annual increases ranged from 1.3% to 5.4%, averaging about 2.9%—closely tracking the generally moderate inflation of the period.
For the average beneficiary, who received approximately $629 monthly in 1990, benefits had grown to about $816 by 2000—an increase that roughly maintained purchasing power but provided little real growth.
This period also saw significant debate about investment-based alternatives to traditional Social Security, spurred by the strong performance of equity markets and concerns about the program’s long-term financing.
“There was this idea floating around that we could do better than the traditional system by investing in stocks,” remembered Margaret Thompson, who worked as a Social Security Administration analyst during this period.
“What many didn’t appreciate was how the guaranteed nature of Social Security payments—their reliability—was itself an enormous value that market-based alternatives couldn’t match.”
Despite extensive discussion of partial privatization, these proposals ultimately failed to gain sufficient political support, and the traditional defined benefit structure of Social Security payments remained intact.
The 2000s: Zero COLAs and Benefit Squeeze
The early 2000s continued the trend of moderate COLAs, but the financial crisis and subsequent Great Recession created unprecedented conditions.
For the first time since automatic adjustments began, beneficiaries received no COLA increase for 2010 and 2011, as the consumer price index failed to show inflation during the measurement period.
“It was technically correct according to the formula, but it felt deeply unfair to many seniors,” noted Max Richtman, president of the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare.
“Many of the costs that hit older Americans hardest—like healthcare and prescription drugs—continued to rise even as overall inflation remained flat.”
This period highlighted growing concerns about whether the CPI-W (Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers)—the metric used to calculate COLAs—adequately reflected the spending patterns and inflation experience of older Americans.
Advocacy groups increasingly pushed for adoption of an elderly-specific inflation measure that would give greater weight to healthcare and housing costs, potentially resulting in more generous annual adjustments.
For the average beneficiary receiving about $1,153 monthly in 2010, the lack of COLA increases meant effectively losing purchasing power as various expenses continued to rise despite officially low inflation.
Recent Trends: Volatility and Purchasing Power Concerns
The past decade has seen significant volatility in Social Security payment adjustments, reflecting broader economic conditions.
After the zero-COLA years, beneficiaries received a substantial 5.9% increase for 2022 and an even larger 8.7% adjustment for 2023—the largest in four decades—as post-pandemic inflation surged.
For a typical retiree, this meant an increase of more than $140 in monthly payments between 2021 and 2023, bringing the average retirement benefit to approximately $1,827 per month.
However, these recent increases came after years of historically low COLAs, averaging just 1.4% annually between 2010 and 2020—a period during which many beneficiaries experienced significant erosion in their benefits’ purchasing power.
“The recent large COLAs are playing catch-up after years of inadequate adjustments,” explained Mary Johnson, Social Security policy analyst at The Senior Citizens League.
“Our research indicates that Social Security benefits have lost about 40% of their purchasing power since 2000, despite the COLA mechanism that’s supposed to prevent exactly this kind of erosion.”
This declining purchasing power reflects multiple factors: the use of an inflation measure that may not accurately capture seniors’ expenses, rising Medicare premiums (which are deducted directly from Social Security payments for most beneficiaries), and the increasing tax burden on benefits as income thresholds for taxation have remained fixed rather than being indexed to inflation.
The Geography of Social Security: Regional Payment Disparities
An often overlooked aspect of Social Security payments is how they vary significantly by region, reflecting lifetime earnings differences across states and localities.
In 2023, the average monthly retirement benefit in New Jersey exceeded $1,950, while beneficiaries in Louisiana received less than $1,600 on average.
These disparities reflect the program’s structure as an earned benefit based on lifetime earnings, with higher-wage states naturally producing higher average benefits.
“The regional benefit differences create an interesting dynamic,” observed economist Alicia Munnell, director of the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College.
“Social Security payments provide a more significant economic boost to lower-income regions, where benefits may be lower in dollar terms but represent a larger share of the local economy and consumer spending.”
Indeed, in many rural counties across Appalachia, the Southeast, and parts of the Southwest, Social Security payments constitute more than 10% of total personal income for the entire county, serving as a crucial economic stabilizer.
For individual recipients, however, these regional differences can create challenges, particularly given that the cost of living varies substantially across the country, yet benefits do not include any geographic adjustment.
Looking Forward: The Future of Social Security Payments
As we look toward the future, Social Security payments face both immediate and long-term challenges.
The most pressing concern is the projected depletion of the combined trust funds in the early 2030s, at which point incoming payroll taxes would cover only about 78% of scheduled benefits without legislative action.
This looming fiscal cliff creates uncertainty about future payment levels, though historically Congress has never allowed benefits to be suddenly reduced.
Potential solutions range from increasing payroll tax rates or raising the earnings cap to reducing benefits for future retirees or further increasing the retirement age.
“Each approach involves different tradeoffs between generations and income groups,” explained Eugene Steuerle, a public finance expert at the Urban Institute.
“The longer we wait to address these issues, the more drastic the eventual changes will need to be.”
For current and near-future beneficiaries, questions about whether COLAs will accurately reflect their living costs remain paramount.
Proposals to adopt the CPI-E (Experimental Price Index for the Elderly) or to establish a guaranteed minimum COLA continue to gain support among advocacy groups.
Meanwhile, younger workers increasingly express skepticism about whether they’ll receive benefits comparable to today’s retirees, with surveys showing that many expect significant reductions by the time they reach retirement age.
The Evolving Promise of Economic Security
From Ida May Fuller’s first modest check to today’s average monthly payment of over $1,800, Social Security has evolved from a limited program primarily designed to prevent absolute poverty among the elderly into a comprehensive system that provides nearly universal retirement, disability, and survivor coverage.
The history of Social Security payments reflects broader societal shifts: from the program’s initial expansion during the post-war economic boom, through periods of generous benefit growth, to more recent concerns about long-term sustainability and benefit adequacy.
Throughout these changes, the fundamental promise has remained constant: to provide American workers and their families with a measure of economic security in the face of retirement, disability, or the death of a breadwinner.
As one retiree, 74-year-old Patricia Dominguez from Arizona, told me, “The check isn’t huge, but it’s the reliability that matters most. Every month, without fail, it’s there—something solid in an uncertain world.”
For millions of Americans like Patricia, Social Security payments represent not just dollars and cents, but the tangible fulfillment of a collective promise that forms a cornerstone of our social contract—a promise that has been kept, if imperfectly, for more than eight decades and counting.
As the program confronts new challenges in the coming years, the fundamental question remains whether and how this promise will continue to be honored for future generations of Americans.
Also Read –
Student Loan Forgiveness for April 2025, Check your Eligibility Now